Followers from legalization out of same-sex partnerships wanted to give her or him a similar legal rights as marriage ceremonies

Followers from legalization out of same-sex partnerships wanted to give her or him a similar legal rights as marriage ceremonies

The outcomes of your own Mann–Whitney You sample displayed mathematically tall intercourse-related difference between the respondents’ answers for every of analyzed comments throughout the respond to shipments, that have p put as the Desk 4 Mann–Whitney You attempt to the changeable “sex” (2019)

The results of Kruskal–Wallis take to to possess details with more kinds imply that, depending on the used presumptions that p Table 5 Kruskal–Wallis shot having details: many years, place of house, training, and you may shipments of governmental tastes off to the right-kept axis (2019)

Regarding all of the statements, there had been mathematically extreme correlations at the p Dining table 6 Spearman’s rank-acquisition correlation from questions about intercourse, ages, place of quarters, studies, and you can governmental choices on the right-left axis (2019)

Followers out of legalization off exact same-gender relationship opposed new declaration you to matrimony is only a relationship between a lady and you can a man. A robust negative relationship (?0.66) was noted within answers to comments [A] and you can [B]. And, a premier negative dependency (?0.62) is actually noticed between statements [B] and you will [C]. People respondents whom believed that relationships try an effective union just ranging from a female and one don’t agree to promote exact same-intercourse partnerships a similar rights as marriage ceremonies. A strong confident correlation (0.71) is actually indexed anywhere between statements [A] and [C]. A failing self-confident correlation is listed within shipments of the respondents’ responses out of statements [A] and you can [D] (0.36) and [C] and you will [D] (0.36). But not, regarding the newest solutions regarding statements [B] and you will [D], a weak bad dependence are observed (?0.29). Most of the listed correlations is mathematically extreme with p Dining table seven Spearman’s review-order relationship (2019)

Throughout the eldest years category, 60.1% of your participants opposed, and you will % strongly compared report [A]. Contained in this years category, % of one’s participants conveyed service to possess statement [A]. Plus the decrease in years, this new part of respondents other declaration [A] methodically dropped concise from % throughout the 25–34 ages classification. From the youngest category, there is certainly a small upsurge in rivals (to help you %), but in addition the high portion of supporters (47%) getting statement [A]. Just regarding youngest age class supporters away from exact same-intercourse relationship exceeded the competitors, while the percentage of those who had no advice on this material is actually the tiniest compared to other groups.

In the youngest age group, in the % of females was in support of legalizing same-intercourse partnerships, and there was merely % of such answers certainly guys. In this years group, 3 x as much females due to the fact guys expressed solid assistance to possess statement [A]. Only % of females regarding assessed years class indicated strong opposition in order to declaration [A]; one of guys, it thoughts is conveyed by the % of your participants.

The latest distribution out of solutions by place out-of house reveals that around was indeed mathematically tall differences because of the measurements of places (Dining table cuatro). A low (%) assistance to own report [A] was indicated because of the inhabitants regarding rural portion (which have agriculture-based cost savings). Within classification, there’s the greatest percentage (%) of these go against it report.

In turn, those people participants exactly who laid out their views as center-right, otherwise particularly correct-side, and you may chosen to own proper-wing activities, was primarily from the legalization regarding same-gender unions

Knowledge of your own respondents is a statistically extreme basis (Dining table 5). An obvious matchmaking try receive ranging from knowledge and you may help for the declaration in question (rho = 0.21, p


The brand new need for the latest legalization regarding same-intercourse unions isn’t recognized because of the most voters into the Poland, and there are obvious differences in this value between supporters out of personal people. The latest separating range out of support having exact same-sex unions demonstrably distinguishes the ideas from voters away from kept-wing people out-of those help best-side of them. Those people voters just who laid out its viewpoints as the kept-side or heart-remaining and you may which supported remaining-wing parties during the elections had been prone to take on exact same-gender joined partnerships.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *